Ongoing investigations into the January 6 Capitol riots have put Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy in the spotlight for his crucial role in authorizing the National Guard’s deployment on that chaotic day. Allegations about McCarthy’s loyalty to General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and his actions—or inactions—during the critical moments have sparked significant speculation and concern.
On Tuesday, June 11, a tweet highlighted McCarthy’s purported absence on the afternoon of January 6, drawing intense scrutiny. As the riots escalated, General William Walker, commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, and his team were at the armory from 6 a.m., ready to respond. However, their attempts to reach McCarthy for authorization allegedly went unanswered, delaying the National Guard’s deployment to the Capitol.
This reported absence has raised serious questions about McCarthy’s leadership and decision-making, especially given his responsibility for National Guard deployment. Although McCarthy has not publicly addressed these allegations, the delay from the Department of Defense (DOD) in providing a response has intensified criticism.
More Read
The timing of McCarthy’s absence coincided with the violent storming of the Capitol by supporters of then-President Donald Trump, attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The breach led to casualties, extensive damage, and a temporary halt in certifying President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.
In the wake of the Capitol riots, multiple investigations have been launched to scrutinize the security failures and the government’s response. The National Guard’s delayed deployment has been a focal point, with questions about the approval process and the hours lost before reinforcements arrived.
General Walker’s congressional testimony highlighted the authorization challenges and the delay in National Guard deployment, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency within the DOD. These revelations have intensified calls for a thorough investigation into McCarthy’s role and actions during the Capitol riots.
As congressional committees continue to examine the events leading up to and following the breach, McCarthy’s leadership and decision-making are under increasing scrutiny. His alleged absence not only impacts the immediate aftermath of January 6 but also raises broader questions about the chain of command, communication protocols, and leadership within the DOD.
As these investigations progress, the American public, lawmakers, and military officials are keenly observing how these issues are addressed and what measures will be implemented to prevent future lapses. McCarthy’s tenure as Army Secretary remains uncertain, with his actions on January 6 casting a long shadow over his leadership and legacy in the Department of Defense.
The nation’s pursuit of accountability and transparency is crucial to restoring public trust and confidence in the institutions responsible for safeguarding democracy.
