Judicial Watch has intensified its scrutiny of the Biden administration’s immigration policies following revelations from a federal audit. The audit disclosed that between 2020 and 2023, the Department of State granted a staggering 7.1 million visas without the standard vetting procedures, citing pandemic-related constraints. This lapse has sparked grave national security concerns, as these visas were issued without in-person interviews and fingerprint collection.
The Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General report highlighted significant shortcomings, particularly in the delegation of screening responsibilities to Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which was reportedly unaware of the waived vetting procedures initially. This oversight has potentially exposed vulnerabilities in the immigration system at a time of heightened scrutiny over border security.
Judicial Watch, known for its advocacy in transparency and accountability, underscored these findings in light of recent Supreme Court decisions. The organization celebrated what it deemed a victory for the rule of law and presidential immunity, which it sees as pivotal in dismissing charges against former President Trump related to his presidency’s actions.
More Read
The legal battles between Judicial Watch and various federal agencies, including the State Department and the National Archives, continue to unfold. These lawsuits aim to uncover records and communications pertinent to controversies such as the Mar-a-Lago raid and Trump White House records.
Amidst these legal maneuvers, Judicial Watch has also pursued justice for Jimmy Wilgus, an American musician imprisoned in Russia under contentious circumstances. Wilgus’s case has drawn attention to allegations of wrongful detention, prompting Judicial Watch to file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit demanding transparency from the State Department regarding his imprisonment.
As the debate over immigration policies and national security intensifies, Judicial Watch’s actions serve as a reminder of ongoing legal battles and advocacy for governmental accountability. The organization’s efforts coincide with broader discussions on the responsibilities of federal agencies in safeguarding national interests and upholding transparency in governmental actions.
