Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., has recently criticized Vice President Kamala Harris for what he calls a “radical” political agenda that is being obscured by the mainstream media. Speaking on Newsmax’s “Saturday Report” on August 17, 2024, Van Drew alleged that the media is deliberately protecting Harris from scrutiny, thereby misleading the public about her true policy positions.
Van Drew argued that the mainstream media is “in Kamala Harris’ pocket,” accusing it of concealing her extreme views. According to Van Drew, the Democratic Party is employing a strategic approach to portray Harris as a moderate, avoiding serious discussion about her policies. He suggested that this polished image, reinforced by carefully crafted TV ads and light-hearted interviews, is designed to appeal to middle America while masking her more radical proposals.
The congressman criticized the superficial nature of recent media coverage, which he claims has focused on trivial aspects of Harris’ personal life, such as her favorite foods and music, rather than substantive policy issues. Van Drew argued that this is part of a broader strategy to present Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, as relatable and mainstream, despite their actual policy stances being far from moderate.
More Read
Van Drew expressed concern that if Harris and Walz were to assume office, their agenda could lead to a “socialistic left-wing government” with severe consequences for the country. He cited several policy proposals by Harris that he believes are detrimental, including the legalization of illegal immigration, expansion of the nuclear agreement with Iran, and reduction of domestic energy production. Van Drew warned that Harris’ policies could exacerbate inflation, increase interest rates, and worsen conditions in urban areas.
He also expressed skepticism about Harris’ performance in unscripted situations such as debates, suggesting that her public image is carefully managed to prevent revealing any weaknesses. Van Drew urged Republicans to focus on presenting the true nature of Harris’ policies to voters, rather than engaging in personal attacks.
As the 2024 election approaches, Van Drew emphasized the importance of educating the electorate about Harris’ policies, asserting that the stakes are too high to allow the election to become a mere popularity contest. “We don’t have to say nasty things about her… all we need to do is say these are her policies,” he concluded, stressing the need for a factual counter-narrative to the Democratic portrayal of Harris.
This critique of Kamala Harris highlights ongoing debates about media influence and political strategy in the lead-up to the presidential election, underscoring the deep divisions and high stakes of American politics.
