GOP Senator Lindsey Graham expressed doubt about the strength of evidence presented in the ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. Graham’s comments, reported by NBC News on December 17, 2023, suggested a lack of compelling proof linking Biden to financial gains from his son Hunter’s business dealings. When pressed about his stance, Graham hinted at a lack of a smoking gun and stated, “If there were a smoking gun, I think we’d be talking about it.” This skepticism reflects concerns within the GOP about the inquiry’s ability to substantiate claims against President Biden.
Graham further asserted that the narrative presented regarding Hunter Biden’s business dealings and Joe Biden’s knowledge is falling apart. He emphasized that he is not worried about impeaching the president. Senator Chuck Grassley and Senator Markwayne Mullin share Graham’s doubts about the existence of substantial evidence against President Biden.
Mullin cautioned against pursuing impeachment based on actions predating Biden’s 2020 election, emphasizing the high bar for conviction. Meanwhile, Senator Ron Johnson voiced frustration with the Democratic Party and the media, accusing them of overlooking evidence of corruption involving President Biden.
More Read
Johnson argued that there is evidence such as checks, emails, and testimony pointing to questionable dealings by the Biden family with foreign entities adversarial to the U.S. These concerns align with a broader narrative within the GOP, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence before pursuing any potential impeachment case against President Biden.
Despite partisan divisions, senators like Graham, Grassley, Mullin, and Johnson highlight the importance of a robust and convictable case before taking any action against the sitting president. Their statements contribute to the ongoing debate over the strength of the allegations against President Biden and the level of evidence required to sway public opinion and secure bipartisan support for potential proceedings.
