A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has temporarily lifted the gag order imposed on former President Donald Trump. The order, put in place to prevent Trump from making statements about potential witnesses or disparaging comments about prosecutors involved in the federal election interference case against him, will remain on hold until after the appeals court hears oral arguments regarding Trump’s request for permanent removal of the gag order. The oral arguments are scheduled for November 20, as stated in the court filing.
This decision marks a victory for Trump’s legal team, who vehemently argued that the gag order violated the former president’s First Amendment rights. Trump’s attorneys had strongly criticized the order, asserting that it exhibited “unconstitutional hostility” towards Trump’s perspective and demanded an immediate stay.
Special counsel Jack Smith’s office, representing the prosecution, contended that the gag order was essential to safeguard the trial’s integrity and the impartiality of the jury pool. They pointed to instances on social media and in interviews where Trump had publicly maligned witnesses and intentionally commented on specific topics related to their potential trial testimonies.
More Read
Notably, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan of Washington, D.C., who presided over the case, clarified that her ruling did not restrict statements critical of the government or the Justice Department broadly. She also made it clear that Trump was free to voice his claims of a politically motivated prosecution and criticize the campaign platforms or policies of his political rivals, such as former Vice President Mike Pence.
Additionally, Judge Authur Engoron, overseeing Trump’s $250 million civil fraud trial, had previously issued a partial gag order on the former president. This order was expanded to include Trump’s attorneys after they falsely accused Engoron’s principal law clerk of bias against them. Trump was fined twice for violating this order, following disparaging remarks he made on social media and to reporters about the clerk.
A spokesperson from Smith’s office declined to comment on the recent development, while a courtroom clerk for Judge Chutkan did not provide an immediate response to inquiries made on Friday evening. As the legal battle unfolds, all eyes are now on the upcoming oral arguments, which will play a crucial role in determining the fate of the gag order in this high-profile case.
