President Joe Biden’s conspicuous absence from the inaugural Democratic primary debate of the 2024 season is raising eyebrows, drawing comparisons to the unconventional strategy employed by former President Donald Trump during the 2016 Republican primaries.
The January 9, 2024 report from USA Today sheds light on the unfolding dynamics, which unfolded at New England College in New Hampshire. The President’s decision to forgo the debate mirrors Trump’s unorthodox approach, diverging from the traditional norms of primary contests.
President Biden’s choice to skip the New Hampshire primary, merely two weeks before the state’s crucial first-in-the-nation contest, stems from a disagreement regarding the state’s position on the Democratic primary calendar. The debate’s regulations mandated the presence of all participants on the New Hampshire Democratic ballot, a condition incompatible with Biden’s write-in campaign strategy.
More Read
While logistical constraints and strategic considerations influenced Biden’s absence, the situation has drawn parallels with Trump’s unique tactics during the 2016 Republican primary debates. Trump’s distinctive strategy, characterized by a departure from conventional norms, resonated with certain voter segments.
Despite not physically participating in the debate, President Biden remains a significant figure in the New Hampshire primary. A Saint Anselm College Survey Center poll from mid-December revealed that 50% of Democrats intend to write in Biden’s name, underscoring substantial support for the incumbent president in the state.
The ongoing dispute over the timing of New Hampshire’s primary, with national Democrats pushing for a later contest in the 2024 cycle, adds complexity to Biden’s decision to forgo the primary ballot. While New Hampshire, by law, is required to host the first primary, Biden supported national Democrats’ efforts last year to postpone the state’s election in the 2024 cycle.
The disagreement prompted Biden to abstain from running in the Granite State after the national party threatened penalties for any candidates on the ballot. This move, perceived by some as a form of voter suppression, led to frustration among residents like Taylor, a retired IBM employee from Concord. Despite the setback, Taylor remains resolute, planning to write in Biden’s name on Jan. 23, emphasizing his experience and accomplishments.
The national party’s threat of penalties further fueled controversy, prompting Biden’s decision to forgo participation in the primary. The absence of a direct debate involving President Biden has ignited discussions about the nature of primary contests and the evolving strategies adopted by candidates in the current political landscape.
