As discussions around election fraud persist, recent revelations suggest potential misconduct by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), raising concerns about canceled votes for former President Donald Trump and the lack of accountability. The complexity of election fraud extends beyond individual cases, prompting a call for vigilance in investigating irregularities across various jurisdictions.
The claim that the ACLU canceled Trump votes without facing consequences highlights the need for scrutiny in jurisdictions where the organization was active. Election fraud investigators are advised to examine whether the ACLU played a role in specific cities, counties, or states under investigation, suggesting that election fraud may be more widespread and intricate than initially perceived.
A seasoned election fraud investigator emphasizes the outdated nature of poll watching training and calls for contemporary, internet-era training to detect irregularities on electronic devices. The narrative delves into alleged networks involved in election fraud, mentioning the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a Democrat-funded group. The claim suggests that the SEIU strategically hires and unionizes caregivers to manipulate ballots in nursing homes and group care facilities on a national scale.
More Read
The mention of financial incentives, $5000 per ballot, adds a monetary dimension to the alleged fraudulent activities. The revelations raise questions about the broader narrative surrounding the 2020 election, emphasizing claims that the vote was stolen. References to Georgia’s vote count and Mark Zuckerberg’s controversial $400,000 deal contribute to suspicions about the election’s integrity.
The multifaceted nature of election fraud, as outlined in recent claims, underscores the complexity of investigating various actors and factors involved. From actions by the ACLU to concerns about outdated poll watcher training and intricate networks like the SEIU, the evolving narrative emphasizes the need for accountability and vigilance in safeguarding the democratic process.
