Michael Roman, a co-defendant of former President Donald Trump, has filed a 39-page court document claiming that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade are entangled in a romantic relationship. This explosive allegation, outlined in detail in the filing seeking Roman’s charges dismissal, raises concerns about the fairness of the legal proceedings surrounding the case.
Despite the absence of direct evidence, the filing questions the integrity of the process through which Willis appointed Wade and suggests they have traveled together to destinations like Napa Valley. Notably, Roman’s attorney, Ashleigh Merchant, argues that Willis appointed her alleged romantic partner, a married man currently undergoing divorce proceedings.
Merchant contends that this purported relationship compromises the impartiality of the case and demands the disqualification of Willis, Wade, and the entire District Attorney’s office from prosecuting. While acknowledging the lack of concrete evidence in the filing, Merchant hints at forthcoming revelations, particularly from the unsealing of Wade’s divorce records.
More Read
The legal drama unfolds as Roman faces a racketeering charge, accused of conspiring to organize “alternate electors” following President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory. Despite four defendants pleading guilty, both Roman and Trump, facing a total of 13 criminal counts, maintain their innocence.
The District Attorney’s office responded to the allegations, assuring a formal response in a court filing. However, they refrained from commenting further on the ongoing situation.
In response, Trump took to Truth Social, accusing Willis and Wade of professional and financial improprieties. This aligns with a pattern of criticism directed at prosecutors and judges involved in Trump’s legal challenges.
As the controversy adds complexity to an already high-profile case, the focus now shifts to the anticipated court response from the District Attorney’s office and the potential unsealing of Nathan Wade’s divorce records. These records could provide crucial insights into the validity of the allegations against the prosecutors handling this closely watched legal matter.
