Shocking revelation, explosive testimony from Biden family associate Jason Galanis has surfaced, suggesting that Hunter Biden may have utilized his father’s influential name to secure highly profitable business deals. The report, published by the Federalist on March 4, 2024, unveils a series of jaw-dropping claims that raise questions about the business practices of the Biden family.
Galanis, in a detailed testimony before the House Oversight Committee, disclosed the extent of his involvement with Hunter Biden and Devon Archer between 2012 and 2015. According to Galanis, their objective went beyond making millions; their ambition was to amass billions through business ventures.
The focal point of their strategy was providing foreign businessmen with access to then-Vice President Joe Biden. The acquisition of Burnham and Company, a renowned 85-year-old Wall Street firm, and other ventures in insurance and wealth management set the stage for the creation of a “Biden family office” within a globally influential financial company.
During a meeting at the Peninsula Bar in New York, Galanis witnessed Hunter receiving a call from his father regarding assistance in closing a deal related to a Chinese financial services company worth a staggering $300 billion. This incident, according to Galanis, was not isolated, as Hunter reportedly contacted his father on multiple occasions for business matters.
In 2014, a call between Hunter Biden and Yelena Baturina, the widow of a former Moscow mayor, took place with Vice President Biden on speakerphone. This strategically orchestrated call aimed to impress Russian investors, showcasing Hunter’s direct access to his father and the influence it wielded.
Devon Archer, who served with Hunter on the board of Burisma, echoed similar sentiments during his testimony last year, describing the Biden name as a “brand” used to attract investors and intimidate adversaries.
Galanis, currently serving a 14-year prison sentence for securities fraud, expressed concerns that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York treated Archer and Hunter Biden leniently, possibly to protect Joe Biden.
Hunter Biden, appearing before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees recently, failed to provide substantial offerings in his testimony, emphasizing the access he had to his father.
Galanis underscored this point, stating that Hunter’s value to their business was solely based on his family name and the political access it provided.
These revelations from Galanis’ testimony cast a spotlight on the questionable business practices and potential influence-peddling involving Hunter Biden and his ties to his father, Joe Biden. The implications of these allegations could have far-reaching consequences, raising concerns about the ethicality of leveraging political connections for personal gain.
