Former Attorney General Drops Bombshell: Shocking Constitutional Flaw That Might Topple Trump’s Special Counsel Case! You Won’t Believe What’s Uncovered

Former Attorney General Ed Meese, along with law professors Steven G. Calabresi and Gary S. Lawson, has presented arguments to the Supreme Court, urging them to reject Special Counsel Jack Smith’s requests based on an allegedly unconstitutional appointment. Meese filed a friend-of-the-court brief, asserting that Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of Smith, a private citizen, violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. The brief likens Smith to a “naked emperor” and argues that his appointment lacks the authority of the federal government. Meese contends that Smith, being improperly appointed, lacks the mandate to represent the United States in the Court. The legal action responds to Smith’s plea to expedite former President Donald Trump’s case regarding presidential immunity on charges related to January 6, 2021. Meese argues that the alleged “illegality” of Smith’s appointment should be sufficient to deny further review, emphasizing the absence of statutory and constitutional authority for Smith’s appointment and adding complexity to discussions on executive authority and limitations.