In a startling revelation that has ignited a firestorm on social media, investigator Brian Lupo’s recent report for The Gateway Pundit challenges the credibility of Georgia’s post-2020 election audit, thrusting Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger into the spotlight.
Lupo’s investigation suggests a lack of concrete evidence supporting the assertion that a comprehensive voting machine election audit took place in Georgia, casting a shadow over the transparency and integrity of the electoral process in the state.
The controversy traces back to a pivotal announcement by Secretary Raffensperger on November 17, 2020, where he claimed that a forensic audit had been conducted with “no sign of foul play” in the 2020 election. However, discrepancies emerge as investigative journalist Kevin Moncla, collaborating with others, initiated Open Records Requests from the purportedly audited counties in 2022.
Raffensperger’s statement had identified six audited counties, but the Pro V&V memo, a voting machine testing company involved in the process, listed only four. Floyd County (Rome, GA), Douglas County (Douglasville, GA), Paulding County (Dallas, GA), and Cobb County (Marietta, GA) were mentioned, but records from these counties failed to confirm Pro V&V’s involvement in any audit of their voting equipment.
The absence of documentation has triggered widespread concerns, with citizens and legal experts questioning the legitimacy of the entire audit process. Social media platforms, particularly The Vigilant Fox and Vigilant News Network, have amplified the story, leading to a viral sensation and sparking outrage over the potential lack of transparency in Georgia’s election procedures.
As discussions unfold, users express disbelief at the possibility that the purported audit may have been a facade, designed to project an image of transparency. The lack of corroborating records adds complexity to an already contentious issue, making The Gateway Pundit’s report a focal point for those seeking answers and accountability in the realm of election oversight.
The credibility of official statements and the actions of the Secretary of State’s office are now under intense scrutiny, prompting growing calls for a thorough investigation into the revealed discrepancies. Citizens are demanding transparency and clarity, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues integral to the democratic process.
As the nation watches, the coming days will determine how Georgia officials respond to this bombshell revelation and whether it will catalyze broader investigations into the conduct of the alleged audit. The implications of this report extend beyond Georgia, raising critical questions about the reliability of election audits and the necessity for robust oversight to safeguard democratic principles nationwide.