Federal agencies may have turned a blind eye to multiple warnings about potential wrongdoing linked to Hunter Biden, as revealed by Just the News. Concerns have been raised about investigations into Hunter Biden’s actions by agencies such as the IRS and FBI, suggesting they may have been halted for various reasons.
House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman, James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, has voiced these concerns. According to Newsmax writer Charles Kim, Comer hinted at the possibility of fear over embarrassing President Joe Biden or worries that investigations could implicate the President himself.
The report suggests that federal agencies received notifications about Hunter Biden’s suspicious activities from various sources dating back to 2015. However, it appears that no visible action was taken to investigate or prosecute him.
One significant incident outlined in the report dates back to May 2015 when bankers at Morgan Stanley raised concerns about “suspicious” transactions involving Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca firm and his business associate, Devon Archer. The bankers presented evidence, including photos and a dossier, to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of their compliance with regulations.
The questionable transactions were related to the overvaluation of the Wakpamni 2014 bonds, initially valued at $111 each but never traded and eventually sold in the $80 range. While the SEC initiated an investigation involving the IRS and FBI following this presentation, leading to the arrest and conviction of Archer and others for securities fraud, Hunter Biden was subpoenaed but not charged.
In November 2016, a whistleblower complaint was lodged with the SEC by a Morgan Stanley banker who had worked on the 2015 presentation. The whistleblower offered new information about additional securities fraud.
In 2018, as Delaware State Police investigated Hunter Biden for a “gun charge” linked to false statements on an application about his drug addiction, a Ukrainian prosecutor reportedly approached a U.S. Attorney in New York concerning information about Hunter Biden’s activities on the board of the Burisma energy company. The prosecutor accused former Vice President Joe Biden of using his influence to protect the company in exchange for financial gain.
These revelations contribute to the ongoing discussions surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings and potential legal issues. The question of why these warnings and concerns did not lead to more significant investigations continues to be a subject of interest and scrutiny.
