In an interview on “Breitbart News Daily” on SiriusXM, former President Donald Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, expressed skepticism about the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling disqualifying Trump from the state’s 2024 Republican primary ballot. Habba argued that the decision lacked constitutional grounding and due process, characterizing it as a politically motivated move by liberal judges to sideline Trump due to their perceived inability to compete with President Biden at the ballot box.
Habba highlighted the irony of a pending January 6 charge while due process seemed to take a back seat. She asserted that the decision was not based on constitutional principles and represented a departure from the fundamental aspects of the American legal system. Habba’s stance aligns with the sentiment among Trump’s supporters, who view the ruling as politically motivated rather than a fair assessment of Trump’s eligibility.
Expressing confidence, Habba predicted that the U.S. Supreme Court would ultimately overturn the decision, setting the stage for a potential legal battle with far-reaching implications for Trump’s political future. The controversy surrounding Trump’s eligibility extends beyond legal nuances, delving into the partisan divide in American politics. The anticipation of the Supreme Court’s involvement introduces uncertainty, raising questions about the impact of state-level decisions on the political aspirations of prominent figures and the broader intersection of law and politics in the United States.
