In a pivotal turn of events surrounding the ongoing Donald Trump Election case, former Fulton County Assistant District Attorney Darryl Cohen has voiced his concerns about Fulton DA Fani Willis, following allegations of an affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Cohen, in an exclusive interview with NewsNation’s Dan Abrams, shared insights into the controversy that has now become entwined with the high-stakes legal proceedings.
The controversy, detailed in a Mediaite report on Sunday, January 21, 2024, has prompted a Superior Court judge in Georgia to schedule a hearing on February 15th to delve into the accusations against Willis. The move comes in response to claims by attorneys representing one of the defendants, arguing that Willis’s alleged relationship with Wade renders her unfit to handle the case.
The allegations not only raise questions about the personal conduct of the Fulton County District Attorney but also hint at potential financial implications for Willis, an assertion vehemently denied by her. In her defense, Willis has labeled the accusations as racially motivated.
More Read
Cohen, who briefly worked on a case involving the former president, expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Willis being removed from the case or the indictment being quashed. He criticized Willis’s defense strategy, particularly her decision to invoke race as a shield against the allegations, deeming it a “not a good move” with “terrible optics.”
When queried about the significance of the judge scheduling a hearing on the affair allegations, Cohen suggested that transparency is the objective. He emphasized that the court of public opinion remains uninfluenced by considerations of race, raising questions about Willis’s judgment in adopting such a defense strategy.
Despite being a friend of Willis, Cohen expressed uncertainty about her decision-making process, highlighting the unfavorable optics of the situation. Drawing parallels to a Shakespearean drama, he urged transparency and the acknowledgment of mistakes if an affair indeed transpired.
Addressing potential consequences if the affair is confirmed during the hearing, Cohen downplayed its significance, stating that the public tends to be forgiving. He recommended acknowledging any lapses in judgment and moving forward as a more prudent approach.
Cohen also conveyed confidence in Wade’s qualifications as a prosecutor, emphasizing that the focus should remain on the facts of the case. Abrams, recognizing the challenging nature of the upcoming hearing for Willis, noted the global attention the case has garnered. Cohen concurred, characterizing the scrutiny as extending beyond Atlanta or Georgia, deeming it a universal matter.
The unfolding drama surrounding Fani Willis and the allegations of an affair with Nathan Wade adds another layer of complexity to an already high-profile case, transforming it into a focal point of international interest.
