In a fresh development in the ongoing legal tussle, a group seeking to bar former President Donald Trump from Colorado’s primary ballot has filed an appeal with the state’s Supreme Court, as reported by Fox News on Tuesday, November 21.
The appeal follows a recent decision by Colorado 2nd Judicial District Court Judge Sarah Wallace, who maintained Trump’s eligibility for the ballot despite allegations of inciting the Capitol riot.
The heart of the legal dispute revolves around the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause, which forbids individuals engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding office.
More Read
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and six Colorado voters initiated the lawsuit in September, arguing that Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, fall within the scope of this disqualification clause.
Judge Wallace’s ruling contested this, asserting that the 14th Amendment’s insurrectionist ban does not extend to the presidency. She argued that the term “office” does not encompass the position of the president, leading her to order the inclusion of Trump on the primary ballot.
This decision aligns with a similar ruling in Michigan, where a judge concluded that Trump should stay on the primary ballot. Challenges in Minnesota and New Hampshire were also dismissed by state and federal courts, respectively.
CREW President Noah Bookbinder emphasized the judge’s finding that Trump engaged in insurrection, underscoring the group’s determination to pursue the case and secure Trump’s removal from the ballot.
In response, Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, dismissed the case as a “cynical and blatant political attempt” by Democrats to interfere with the election, characterizing these challenges as efforts to undermine the democratic process.
Legal experts speculate that the Colorado case may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, emphasizing the broader implications of the dispute.
Simultaneously, Trump confronts other legal challenges, including indictments in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the Capitol riot and alleged interference in the 2020 election.
Despite these legal battles, Trump’s spokesperson reiterated the former president’s plea of not guilty to all charges, framing these cases as politically motivated attempts to tarnish his reputation.
As the legal wrangling persists, Colorado finds itself at the epicenter of a national debate over the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and its applicability to a former president seeking a return to the political stage. The outcome of this case may set precedents for future challenges under similar circumstances and significantly influence the dynamics of the upcoming presidential election.
