Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has made a shocking declaration that has sent ripples through the political world. In a recent statement, Raskin argued that Congress must take decisive action to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential race if he wins, a move that has left MAGA supporters stunned and sparked a fierce national debate.
Speaking to an engaged audience, Raskin emphasized that the Supreme Court’s recent decision, which ruled against using the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from the ballot, does not resolve the issue. According to statements made by Charlie Kirk on X, Raskin’s call for Congressional intervention is a direct challenge to the court’s stance, highlighting a potential constitutional crisis.
“The court is not going to save us,” Raskin asserted, pointing to Congress as the body responsible for disqualifying Trump on January 6, 2025. He invoked the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment, originally designed to prevent former Confederate officials from holding office. “The only thing that really works is people in motion amending the Constitution — but again, it’s necessary, but it’s not sufficient,” Raskin said.
More Read
Raskin’s criticism of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, particularly Section 3, which deals with insurrection, has intensified the debate. He warned that disqualifying Trump could lead to “civil war conditions,” underscoring the high stakes of this political showdown.
MAGA supporters have reacted vehemently to Raskin’s remarks. Social media platforms have been abuzz with outrage, as many Trump loyalists vow to resist any efforts to disqualify him. “If Trump is elected by the people and rejected by Congress, you can bet there will be some ‘issues,’” warned Dean, a committed Trump supporter.
The debate over the 14th Amendment and Congressional authority versus judicial interpretation has further polarized the nation. Legal scholars and political analysts are divided on whether Raskin’s interpretation of the amendment is valid or if it sets a dangerous precedent.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath…to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Raskin’s argument hinges on the claim that Trump’s actions related to the January 6 Capitol riot qualify as insurrection, thereby making him ineligible for office. However, with the Supreme Court declining to disqualify Trump based on this clause, the ultimate decision now rests with Congress.
As the 2024 election approaches, Raskin’s bold proclamation has injected new tension into an already contentious political landscape. The coming months will likely see an intensification of the debate over Trump’s eligibility, with both sides gearing up for a high-stakes confrontation that could profoundly impact American democracy.
As January 6, 2025, draws near, all eyes will be on Congress to determine whether they will act on Raskin’s call and the potential consequences of their decision.
