Michigan Supreme Court decision rejecting efforts to bar him from the state’s 2024 presidential and primary ballots, former President Donald Trump expressed appreciation, hailing the ruling as a victory against what he labeled a “Desperate Democrat attempt.” The court’s dismissal of these attempts invoked the 14th Amendment’s “insurrection” clause.
Trump’s commendation, as reported by the Conservative Brief on Thursday, December 28, 2023, underscored his gratitude for the court’s denial, specifically singling out Colorado as the lone state succumbing to what he characterized as a “pathetic gambit to rig the Election.”
Speaking via his Truth Social platform, Trump emphasized the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision’s significance, highlighting its reflection on similar unsuccessful endeavors in traditionally Democratic-leaning states.
More Read
However, Trump criticized the Colorado Supreme Court’s 4-3 decision, branding it a “complete mess” and drawing global ridicule.
He stressed the urgency of addressing what he perceives as a decline under President Joe Biden and the “Radical Left,” reiterating the slogan, “Make America Great Again!”
With conflicting rulings across states and looming appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court, the stakes in these legal battles, particularly in light of the impending 2024 primaries, have intensified.
The Michigan lawsuit’s dismissal before trial and the lack of detailed vote count information have further complicated the situation. Notably, Michigan courts focused on procedural matters rather than exploring the insurrection question stemming from January 6, 2021.
Justice Elizabeth Welch of the Michigan Supreme Court highlighted the state’s unique stance, pointing out the absence of a comparable provision in Michigan Election Law to the one challenged in Colorado.
While the 14th Amendment post-Civil War prohibits those “engaged in insurrection” from holding public office, its application to presidential candidates remains infrequent.
Trump’s legal battles extend beyond Michigan, carrying significant implications for the forthcoming primaries. The divergent decisions in Colorado and other states unwilling to exclude him add layers of complexity to the legal landscape.
Legal analysts have criticized the Colorado ruling, foreseeing its potential overturning by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, Trump is entangled in a $250 million civil fraud trial in Manhattan. Legal expert Michael Conway cautioned Judge Arthur Engoron over his trial conduct, warning of potential consequences linked to perceived judicial bias.
Outside the courtroom, Trump’s interactions with reporters continue, where he denounces the legal proceedings as a “witch hunt” orchestrated by a “crazy” attorney general. These encounters underscore the political and legal challenges he currently confronts.
As these legal battles evolve, Trump remains a prominent figure in the political arena, navigating intricate legal complexities while contending with public perception.
