A strong warning has been articulated to the Supreme Court by Attorney Shan Wu in a column released by the Daily Beast on Saturday, December 30. Wu argues that the current legal framework, with states wielding primary authority over federal elections, is effectively functioning without necessitating the intervention of the Supreme Court.
In emphasizing the effectiveness of this system, Wu highlights the adherence of state officials to specific jurisdictional laws while upholding the 14th Amendment as written. He labels this adherence as a demonstration of “federalism,” stressing the pivotal role states play in shaping election regulations.
“The U.S. Supreme Court needs to recognize that the disqualification of former President Donald J. Trump under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment from running again for President of the United States is progressing appropriately,” Wu states in his column.
More Read
Wu further elaborates on the primary authority of states in administering federal elections, noting that Congress holds the power to regulate election conduct. He views the diversity in rules among states regarding candidacy, voting eligibility, and voting procedures as normal, suggesting the Supreme Court’s non-involvement in these affairs.
Expressing concern over the potential repercussions, Wu urges the justices to abstain from interference, citing the risk of the court being perceived as highly political. He argues that such interference could tarnish the court’s reputation, emphasizing the discretion the court holds in selecting cases.
“There is no issue with the developments at the state level,” Wu asserts. He strongly recommends the Supreme Court refrain from the final appeal in any of these cases, emphasizing the court’s complete discretion in accepting cases.
Wu believes that allowing the various cases to stand would be an undeniable decision by the Supreme Court. He contends that this decision not only prevents a repeat of the court’s involvement in the 2000 presidential election but also potentially aids in restoring the court’s credibility.
Fundamentally, Wu’s argument revolves around the notion that the Supreme Court should trust existing legal mechanisms and permit states to navigate the intricacies of their election systems without undue interference. He asserts that by doing so, the court can avoid getting embroiled in a politically charged situation, thereby safeguarding its integrity and public perception.
