A Virginia federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit aiming to bar former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 primary ballot, citing the absence of standing for the plaintiffs.
The legal challenge, centered on the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, was initiated by activists Roy Perry-Bey and Carlos Howard, alleging that Trump’s alleged involvement in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots constituted insurrection, thus disqualifying him from seeking public office.
According to a report by the New York Post on Saturday, December 30, 2023, Judge Leonie Brinkema, appointed during the tenure of former President Bill Clinton, ruled in favor of Trump, stating that the plaintiffs lacked the necessary standing to pursue his removal from the primary ballot.
More Read
Brinkema underscored that several prior federal court decisions had similarly dismissed citizen suits attempting to disqualify individuals based on their actions on January 6, 2021, emphasizing the failure of the plaintiffs to establish a direct connection between their alleged harm and the defendants’ conduct.
Furthermore, the judge noted the inapplicability of the rulings in Colorado and Maine, where Trump was barred from primary ballots, to the Virginia case due to differences in constitutional claims and jurisdictional limitations.
Despite recent victories for Trump in legal battles, including the Virginia ruling, his campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung accused Democrats of launching a concerted effort to undermine voters’ rights, citing Trump’s strong standing in GOP primary and general election polls.
While the Virginia lawsuit has been dismissed, Trump continues to face challenges elsewhere, with both the Colorado Supreme Court and Maine’s Democratic Secretary of State disqualifying him from their 2024 primary ballots under Section Three of the 14th Amendment. Trump is expected to challenge these decisions through the appeals process, signaling a prolonged legal confrontation.
The ongoing dispute highlights the clash between political strategies and constitutional interpretations, particularly focusing on the insurrection clause in the contentious debate surrounding Trump’s eligibility for public office. As legal battles persist, the landscape of the 2024 presidential election remains charged and subject to further legal and political confrontations.
