Former President Trump took to his Truth Social platform, expressing his desire to testify in the civil fraud trial led by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Trump accused Judge Engoron of bias, labeling the lawsuit a Fake, No Victims, No Jury case.
In a Tuesday post on Newsmax, Trump asserted that the imposed limitations infringed on his constitutional rights, hindering his ability to defend himself. He vented his frustration, questioning the fairness of the trial and emphasizing his innocence.
Trump’s attorney, Chris Kise, echoed these sentiments in a statement to ABC News, criticizing the unconstitutional gag order. Kise suggested that the restrictions played a role in Trump’s decision not to testify fully.
Despite the ongoing legal battle, Judge Engoron allowed the state’s Attorney General to call two witnesses during the rebuttal phase. Trump’s legal team argued that the government strategically held back these witnesses, adding to the trial’s complexity.
The dispute highlights the challenges of balancing a fair trial with maintaining order in a high-profile case. As the drama unfolds, the courtroom remains a battleground for legal arguments and strategic maneuvers, raising questions about the trial’s integrity.