A group of influential Jewish tech leaders recently met with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew to express concerns about the platform’s alleged bias toward Pro-Palestine content. The meeting, which took place on November 16, included about 40 tech leaders, including founders of companies like Gusto, Bonobos, and Tinder.
The tech leaders presented data suggesting that TikTok’s algorithm favors content supporting Palestine over pro-Israel content at a disproportionate rate. They highlighted a 54:1 ratio in views between pro-Palestine and pro-Israel posts and aimed to seek answers and address what they perceive as an unexplained discrepancy. Additionally, the group raised concerns about the rise in antisemitic incidents and its potential correlation to online content, particularly on TikTok.
Anthony Goldbloom, the founder of Sumble, who organized the meeting, shared findings indicating a significant imbalance in engagement with hashtags like #freePalestine and #standwithIsrael. TikTok responded by stating that the methodology used for comparisons was flawed and that its algorithm is not intentionally skewed.
More Read
During the meeting, TikTok’s executives defended the platform, asserting that content is generated by the community, and recommendations are based on users’ previous engagements. Despite these explanations, the tech leaders pressed TikTok to reexamine its algorithms and community guidelines.
TikTok emphasized that the existing imbalance in engagement is due to factors like the longevity of pro-Palestine hashtags and the demographics of its user base. The platform has taken actions to address concerns, including adding moderators proficient in Hebrew and Arabic and removing over a million videos promoting misinformation, terrorism, and hate speech since October 7.
However, the tech leaders remain skeptical, with some expressing disappointment that TikTok might not take substantial action. The platform, already under scrutiny from the U.S. government, now faces additional challenges related to content moderation during the Israel-Palestine conflict.
While TikTok denies intentional bias, critics argue that the platform’s dual allegiance to both the U.S. and Chinese interests complicates its ability to adhere to conflicting legal standards. As tensions continue, TikTok finds itself at the center of a complex geopolitical clash, with calls for increased transparency and a reassessment of content policies.
