Attorneys defending former President Donald Trump have unveiled shocking evidence during a recent court hearing, raising concerns about the handling of his classified documents. The disclosure, which could have a major impact on the case, revolves around extensive communications between various government entities.
According to the Conservative Brief, on November 3, 2023, Trump’s legal team revealed to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that they had found evidence of “extensive communications” between Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the National Archives, and the White House during President Joe Biden’s administration, prior to Trump’s indictment.

Investigative reporter Julie Kelly, who has been closely following these developments, underscored the importance of this revelation. She referred to these findings as “bombshells” and emphasized that they included years’ worth of security footage from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida. The evidence suggests a close collaboration between the White House, the National Archives (NARA), intelligence agencies, and the DOJ in determining the documents for Jack Smith’s indictment.
This controversy traces back to a significant event in August 2022 when the FBI conducted an unprecedented raid on the former president’s home. Just the News reported that the Biden White House had been collaborating with the DOJ and NARA well before the raid to initiate a criminal investigation into alleged document mishandling. This collaboration allowed the FBI to examine materials seized from Mar-a-Lago, effectively removing Trump’s claims of executive privilege.
Government documents from that time revealed that Jonathan Su, then-White House Deputy Counsel, had been in discussions with the FBI, DOJ, and NARA as early as April, shortly after 15 boxes of classified materials were voluntarily returned to the federal historical agency from Trump’s Florida residence. By May, Su had conveyed President Joe Biden’s willingness to waive Trump’s executive privilege claims, leading to the DOJ obtaining a grand jury subpoena for any remaining presidential materials in Trump’s possession. These events are documented in a series of memos and emails exchanged between the involved agencies in the spring of 2022, several months before the FBI’s raid on Trump’s Florida property.
The raid, which sparked outrage among conservatives, was viewed as a significant departure from established norms. Former Fox News host Dan Bongino strongly criticized it, emphasizing that the United States is a constitutional republic and a representative democracy. He expressed concern that the FBI was searching the home of a former president based on political differences.
The controversy surrounding the collaboration between the Biden White House, NARA, the DOJ, and intelligence agencies, along with the subsequent FBI raid, has ignited a heated debate about the principles of democracy and justice in the United States.
As this case continues through the legal system, it is expected to draw significant attention and scrutiny.