former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has delivered a double setback by ruling against his appeal for immunity in a lawsuit linked to the Jan. 6 insurrection. The Raw Story reported on Friday, December 29, 203, that the court’s decision marks another legal setback for Trump, denying his claim of immunity related to the Capitol riot.
Trump’s assertion that his actions were safeguarded under his official duties was dismissed by the court, explicitly stating, “Such speech was, in his view, invariably an official function. We rejected that argument.”
Referencing a U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the 11th District Court of Appeals emphasized that presidential immunity extends only to the boundaries of a president’s official responsibilities.
More Read
While acknowledging a president’s role in addressing matters of public concern, the judges clarified that this does not universally apply to all circumstances.
This ruling addresses multiple lawsuits filed by Capitol police officers and Democratic lawmakers seeking civil damages from Trump concerning the events of Jan. 6. The court’s decision further complicates Trump’s legal standing, adding to the array of legal challenges he currently faces.
This latest court setback follows Trump’s disqualification from the 2024 primary ballot in Maine. Video evidence played a pivotal role in the state’s decision, invoking Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which linked Trump to the Jan. 6 events and subsequently disqualified him based on his alleged involvement in the insurrection.
Trump’s pursuit of immunity encountered additional hurdles as leaked recordings exposed the extent of his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. Former Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro, as part of a plea deal with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, is obligated to disclose his participation in various schemes, including plans involving fake electors and efforts to transport counterfeit ballots to Washington, D.C., ahead of Congress’s electoral vote count on Jan. 6, 2021.
These mounting legal challenges against Trump underscore the severity of the situation, raising concerns about potential involvement of the Supreme Court.
Commenting on Maine’s secretary of state decision, former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade praised the application of the 14th Amendment but cautioned that the Supreme Court’s position is uncertain, stating, “I think these are challenging questions of law, things that have not really been addressed by the Supreme Court before.”
Amidst a complex legal landscape, the firm dismissal of Trump’s appeal for immunity by the court sets the stage for an imminent legal battle. The scrutiny surrounding the former president’s actions and statements related to Jan. 6 looms large, with substantial legal ramifications at stake.
