In a pivotal development in the federal classified-documents case involving former President Donald Trump, Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to deny Special Counsel Jack Smith’s plea for enforcing a routine deadline has ignited accusations of intentional delay tactics, casting shadows over the trial’s timeline and raising concerns about impartiality.
Nominated by Trump, Judge Cannon rejected Smith’s request to compel Trump to disclose his intentions regarding the use of a defense relying on advice from his legal team. Newsweek reported the incident on Saturday, January 13, bringing to light the allegations that Trump aims to postpone the trial until after the November presidential election.
Facing a daunting 40 charges, Trump staunchly denies allegations of illegal retention of classified material and obstructing federal attempts to recover them from his residence at Mar-a-Lago.
More Read
Criticism has mounted against Judge Cannon, with many asserting that her decision plays into Trump’s delay strategy. MSNBC legal analyst Katie Phang pointed out Cannon’s assertion that it is premature to consider compelling Trump to disclose such information, raising questions about the transparency of the legal proceedings.
Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance expressed skepticism about Cannon’s intentions, remarking, “it’s entirely clear she has no intention of letting this case go to trial before the election or possibly ever.”
Critics argue that this is not the first instance where Cannon’s decisions have seemingly favored Trump. Previously, she refused to enforce a routine deadline and ruled in favor of sparing Trump from testifying under oath regarding his FBI conspiracy claim, prompting calls for her recusal based on allegations of bias toward the former president.
Scheduled for May 20, the trial’s fate may witness alterations during the March 1 scheduling conference, merely days before Trump’s federal trial on 2020 election obstruction and conspiracy allegations. Concerns linger that Trump might be employing strategic delays in both trials, potentially leveraging a victory in the 2024 election to influence the Department of Justice or secure a self-pardon if convicted before assuming office in January 2025.
The intricate security protocols implemented by Judge Cannon due to the sensitive nature of classified documents have already resulted in months of delays. Critics contend that these decisions have not only impeded the case’s progress but have also raised fundamental questions about the judge’s impartiality in overseeing this high-profile trial.
