Medea Benjamin, the co-founder of the feminist grassroots organization CODE PINK, has strongly criticized President Joe Biden for his handling of Israel’s military response to a surprise attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas in the southern part of Israel last October. Benjamin went further, suggesting that former President Donald Trump might be a more effective political leader.
The critique, detailed in a report by Newsweek on January 22, 2024, specifically targets Biden’s support for Israel’s military actions, which ensued after the surprise attack by Hamas, resulting in a significant number of casualties and the seizure of hostages.
President Biden’s endorsement of Israel’s response has faced significant backlash, particularly from the left. The conflict not only involved Israel and Gaza but also saw U.S. attacks on Houthi bases in Yemen, sparking a global outcry.
More Read
Despite widespread international calls for a ceasefire, President Biden has resisted such efforts, albeit recently adopting a tougher stance toward Israel. In December, he acknowledged that support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government was waning, citing the escalating death toll in Gaza as a reason for necessary changes.
The criticism of Biden’s position on Israel is multifaceted. A December poll by the New York Times/Siena College revealed that nearly 75 percent of voters aged between 18 and 29 disapprove of Biden’s handling of the conflict. Furthermore, Irish politicians have voiced their disapproval of the President’s stance.
Medea Benjamin, known for her prominent role in the feminist movement and co-founding CODE PINK, has now added her voice to the growing dissent. In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), she raised questions about whether anything in Trump’s presidency compares to what she perceives as the horror of Biden’s support for what she terms “genocide in Gaza.”
This critique echoes a broader sentiment among activists and individuals on the left who find fault with Biden’s approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The comparison to Donald Trump, who served as president before Biden, indicates a dissatisfaction with Biden’s policies, even when measured against those of his predecessor.
The ongoing debate surrounding U.S. involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict remains highly polarized, reflecting diverse opinions on the most appropriate course of action.
Medea Benjamin’s public condemnation of President Biden underscores the complexity of navigating foreign policy decisions, particularly within the context of longstanding alliances and regional conflicts. As discussions persist, the divergent views within the feminist movement and the broader political landscape contribute to ongoing debates about America’s role in the Middle East.
