The quest to thwart Donald Trump’s political resurgence, Democrats are eyeing the 14th Amendment, believing it could bar him from office. A recent move by Colorado’s top court, disqualifying Trump over the January 6, 2021, insurrection, has stirred debate and is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Critics, including Washington Post columnist Greg Sargent, dismiss the notion as oversimplified. Sargent argues against downplaying the 14th Amendment strategy, countering claims that it’s a mere escape from Democratic shortcomings. He emphasizes the need for a nuanced civic discourse.
While a judge contests whether Trump incited insurrection, the Colorado Supreme Court asserts he can’t grace the 2024 ballot due to the 14th Amendment. Trump’s urging of supporters to fight led the court to label it as insurrection, a decision under dispute, destined for the highest court.
Sargent dismisses the dismissal, citing past Democratic victories against Trump and urging acknowledgment of the real possibility of disqualification. The potential Supreme Court ruling raises concerns about institutional integrity, with experts questioning the Colorado court’s handling as more sound than recent Supreme Court actions.
In the midst of these legal battles, Sargent warns against allowing Trump to undermine electoral faith and emphasizes the importance of upholding fundamental rules in democracy. The looming question remains: Is the 14th Amendment a cure-all or a fleeting remedy in the face of Trump’s political resurgence?