Recent revelations from whistleblowers are shaking up the FBI, suggesting that some high-ranking officials are unfairly singling out agents with military backgrounds and conservative views. The accusations involve stripping security clearances, resulting in financial hardship and even homelessness for some individuals.
Deputy Assistant Director Jeffrey Veltri and Assistant Section Chief Dena Perkins are specifically accused of targeting agents with military ties, labeling them disloyal based on perceived support for former President Donald Trump.
The whistleblowers claim that these officials retaliated by removing security clearances without evidence of ties to foreign powers or disloyalty to the U.S. Perkins reportedly even ordered investigations into agents’ backgrounds without proper grounds.
More Read
Surprisingly, behaviors like not wearing masks, skepticism towards COVID-19 vaccination, and engaging in religious activities are cited as indicators of being a right-wing radical and deemed disloyal.
Two specific cases, involving FBI employees Kyle Seraphin and Garret O’Boyle, highlight the severe consequences. Seraphin faced a security clearance investigation after an encounter with a police officer, while O’Boyle lost his clearance and ended up homeless after testifying before Congress.
Despite the FBI’s denial of targeting based on political views, whistleblowers claim the established policies were not followed. O’Boyle, now pursuing legal action against the FBI, argues that quitting his job would jeopardize his case, leaving him in financial limbo.
As these explosive disclosures come to light, questions about the FBI’s internal processes and treatment of its employees are intensifying, raising concerns about trust within one of the nation’s crucial law enforcement agencies.
