House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has affirmed that the House of Representatives will make another attempt to pass a crucial funding package for Israel this week. The decision follows Iran’s recent attack on the Middle Eastern nation, sparking renewed urgency in Congress.
Speaking on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Mr. Johnson addressed the implications of Iran’s attack, purportedly in retaliation for an Israeli strike on an Iranian diplomatic building in Syria, on the House’s plans for funding Israel. He emphasized the House’s persistent recognition of the urgency of the situation, citing previous efforts to secure funding for Israel.
Highlighting past endeavors, Mr. Johnson mentioned the House’s passage of a $14 billion aid package for Israel shortly after he assumed the role of Speaker. However, this bill has stalled in the Senate, awaiting a vote under Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Additionally, the House previously attempted to pass a “clean” funding bill for Israel, facing opposition from a majority of Democrats following President Joe Biden’s threat to veto the bill.
More Read
Undeterred by past setbacks, Mr. Johnson reiterated the commitment of House Republicans to stand with Israel and announced plans for a renewed funding endeavor. He disclosed ongoing efforts to formulate the details of the funding package, exploring various options and supplemental issues.
Responding to inquiries about potential additional funding for Ukraine, Mr. Johnson underscored alignment with former President Donald Trump’s proposals, including the loan-lease concept and the REPO Act. He expressed optimism in garnering consensus on these initiatives, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling obligations to both Israel and Ukraine.
However, uncertainties loom over the path forward. The specifics of the aid bill, including the level of support and potential inclusion of Ukraine, remain undetermined. This poses challenges for Mr. Johnson, given the divided stance within his caucus on funding Ukraine, juxtaposed against unwavering support for Israel.
Moreover, procedural hurdles add complexity to the process. Mr. Johnson faces the prospect of navigating House rules to secure passage, with potential obstacles from members opposed to foreign aid. The alternative route of seeking a suspension of the rules necessitates bipartisan support, raising questions about feasibility given past opposition from Democrats.
In conclusion, while the House gears up for another attempt to provide critical funding for Israel, uncertainties persist regarding the legislative approach and the broader geopolitical dynamics at play. As Mr. Johnson navigates these challenges, the outcome remains uncertain amidst the backdrop of competing interests and procedural intricacies.
