A Wyoming judge recently dismissed a legal motion aimed at excluding former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot. Albany County District Court Judge Misha Westby ruled on Thursday, opting to dismiss the case without prejudice, marking a distinctive turn from similar situations in other states.
The legal dispute, initiated by retired attorney Tim Newcomb on November 1, 2023, targeted both Trump and Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming, who had resisted recognizing Joe Biden’s election win.
Newcomb’s lawsuit sought to bar Trump and Lummis from featuring on Wyoming ballots while also demanding reimbursement for incurred legal fees and expenses. However, Judge Westby’s ruling contrasts with precedents set in Colorado and Maine, where Trump was disqualified from primary ballots under the 14th Amendment.
More Read
Notably, the dismissal without prejudice in Wyoming keeps the possibility open for future legal actions concerning Trump’s eligibility. This decision adds to the ongoing series of legal challenges faced by the former president across multiple states.
Conservative lawyer Harmeet Dhillon highlighted this verdict on social media, shedding light on the persisting legal obstacles confronting Trump.
At the heart of these legal battles lies the invocation of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies individuals engaging in insurrection or rebellion from holding office in the United States. Critics of Trump argue that his alleged attempts to influence the 2020 election outcome and his purported involvement in the January 6 storming of Congress constitute acts of insurrection.
This contention forms the core of arguments challenging Trump’s eligibility for a second presidential term. The cases in Wyoming, Colorado, and Maine all revolve around this pivotal issue.
In Colorado, the Supreme Court’s 4-3 decision on December 19 found Trump’s actions surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, tantamount to direct participation in the insurrection, rendering him ineligible. Similarly, Maine’s Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, concluded that Trump’s dissemination of election fraud claims incited his supporters, resulting in the Capitol breach.
Trump’s legal team is actively appealing these rulings to the Supreme Court. Any affirmation of these verdicts could significantly impact the Republican presidential primary campaign, presenting an unprecedented scenario in modern American history.
The controversy surrounding Trump’s eligibility has sparked strong reactions from his supporters. Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung labeled these legal challenges as “partisan election interference efforts,” denouncing them as a threat to American democracy.
Alina Habba, a lawyer representing Trump, expressed confidence in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s support for the former president. She emphasized the justices’ dedication to upholding the law and ensuring fairness in their rulings.
