Donald Trump’s potential vice presidential candidates have varied in their past criticisms of the former president. Here’s a ranking based on how brutally they once trashed him:
Nikki Haley: The former U.N. Ambassador and South Carolina governor has been vocal in her criticisms of Trump, once stating that he had “flaws” and expressing concerns about his rhetoric. Her past criticisms have been among the most direct and pointed.
Chris Christie: The former New Jersey governor and Trump ally turned critic has not held back in his assessments of Trump’s leadership style and decision-making. Christie has been particularly critical of Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mike Pence: While Pence served as Trump’s vice president, there were moments of disagreement and tension between them, especially during the Capitol riot aftermath. Pence’s loyalty to Trump has been tested at times, leading to speculation about their relationship.
Ted Cruz: The Texas senator and one-time rival of Trump has engaged in heated exchanges with the former president, including during the 2016 Republican primaries. Cruz has criticized Trump’s policies and behavior but has also aligned with him on certain issues.
Tim Scott: The South Carolina senator has had a more measured approach to his criticisms of Trump, focusing on policy differences rather than personal attacks. Scott has expressed concerns about Trump’s rhetoric but has also worked with him on legislative matters.
Ron DeSantis: The Florida governor has generally been supportive of Trump, but there have been instances where he has offered critiques, particularly regarding Trump’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Florida.
Mike Pompeo: As a former Secretary of State and close ally of Trump, Pompeo has been largely supportive of the former president, although he has occasionally differed with Trump on certain foreign policy issues.
This ranking reflects the spectrum of opinions and dynamics within the Republican Party regarding Trump and his presidency. Each potential VP pick brings their own history of interactions and criticisms, shaping the landscape of political alliances and allegiances.