Former President Donald Trump celebrated the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to deny Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request to expedite consideration of presidential immunity, characterizing it as a “desperate attempt to shortcircuit our Great Constitution.” The legal battle revolves around whether Trump, as the 45th president, is immune from prosecution for alleged interference in the 2020 election. Trump contends that, as the president at the time, he is shielded by immunity, making this case potentially landmark with implications for future legal actions against former presidents. The rejection of expedited review underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to standard legal procedures and a thorough examination of the issues at hand, shaping the understanding of presidential immunity and its scope. As the legal proceedings continue, the nation observes how this case contributes to the evolving landscape of presidential immunity and the broader accountability of former leaders.