Recent news, a Trump ally, Laura Loomer, known for her ties to Donald Trump Jr. and a potential role in the next administration, took a swipe at Nikki Haley, a former Trump administration official and GOP primary rival. Loomer questioned Haley’s eligibility, labeling her an anchor baby and claiming she cannot be president.
Loomer argued that Haley, born to legal Sikh immigrants from India, does not meet the criteria of a natural-born citizen, citing her parents’ non-U.S. citizenship at the time of her birth in South Carolina. However, this assertion prompted a response from the social media platform, stating that Haley indeed meets the constitutional requirements for the presidency.
This is false, the platform noted. The Constitution lists only three qualifications for the Presidency: Be at least 35 years old, be a natural-born citizen, and must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years. Haley meets all of those. ‘Anchor babies’ are not illegal.
Despite the correction, Loomer continued to stand by her claims, expressing her lack of confidence in a female president, particularly one she referred to as an anchor baby. The controversy raises questions about the role of personal opinions in political discourse and the importance of accurate information in public discussions.
