Renowned conservative scholar and historian Victor Davis Hanson has weighed in on the Colorado Supreme Court’s recent decision to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot, raising significant questions in a new column. Hanson delves into the implications of this unprecedented move, exploring the historical context of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which the court invoked to bar Trump from the ballot.
In his column for American Greatness, Hanson expresses concern about what he perceives as an Orwellian turn in Trump Derangement Syndrome, emphasizing the court’s use of an amendment initially intended to disqualify officials who sided with the Confederacy after the Civil War. Hanson draws a striking comparison between the left’s condemnation of the events on January 6th and the widespread violence during the summer of 2020, orchestrated by groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
The conservative scholar points out the discrepancy in the left’s response to these two periods of unrest, highlighting the severity of the violence and damages incurred during the 2020 riots. Hanson questions the selective outrage and scrutiny applied to different instances of unrest and spotlights Vice President Kamala Harris’s remarks from 2020, which he interprets as implicit encouragement to the rioters.
By juxtaposing the events of January 6th with the 2020 riots and examining the statements of political figures, Hanson challenges readers to critically assess prevailing narratives and consider the potential consequences of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision. In the midst of ongoing political tensions, Hanson’s column serves as a thought-provoking analysis, urging readers to reflect on the broader implications of using historical amendments to shape contemporary political landscapes.
