Former President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on Tuesday night after a decisive ruling by Judge Arthur Engoron, who dismissed a motion to terminate the ongoing fraud trial initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The trial, closely monitored by the public, is slated for closing arguments on January 11, 2024.
Trump took to Truth Social to express his vehement disapproval of Judge Engoron, accusing him of being a “corrupt and radical” political figure. The former President alleged bias and a deliberate exclusion of a jury from the proceedings. He contended that had the case been in the Commercial Division, it would have been summarily terminated, criticizing the judge for purportedly disregarding a decision by the Appellate Court. Trump insisted that he was unjustly restrained from divulging crucial information, framing it as an illegal gag.
Continuing his assault on social media, Trump labeled Attorney General James as a “Racist Attorney General” and Judge Engoron as a “Runaway Judge.” He asserted that their actions were causing significant harm to the justice system, the state of New York, and the United States at large.
More Read
Trump vehemently argued against the unprecedented use of a statute for the trial’s purposes, lamenting the absence of a jury and alleging a violation of his rights. He portrayed the courtroom as rigged and sought to undermine the credibility of financial statements presented, claiming they showcased impeccable liquidity, hundreds of millions of dollars in cash, and valuable assets worldwide.
Emphasizing his successful dealings with banks, Trump insisted that there were no victims in the case, painting the legal proceedings as orchestrated by a “totally corrupt Prosecutor and Judge.”
As the trial neared its conclusion, Trump announced his decision to forgo testifying on his behalf, attributing it to Judge Engoron’s gag order. Notably, the order solely prohibited attacks on court staff, not Trump’s ability to testify—a point he chose to ignore.
Amidst this legal maelstrom, Trump utilized social media to amplify his grievances, constructing a narrative of unfair treatment, bias, and constitutional violations. The trial’s outcome remains uncertain as it heads toward closing arguments, with the clash between Trump and the New York legal system garnering national attention.
Trump’s persistent attacks extended beyond the courtroom, questioning the motives behind the trial and suggesting a political agenda. He accused AG James of leveraging the case for a failed gubernatorial run, while simultaneously calling for her disbarment.
The intricate legal battle, intertwined with political undertones, has created a charged atmosphere that extends beyond the confines of the courtroom. As the trial approaches its conclusion, the broader implications for both Trump and the justice system persist, ensuring its relevance resonates far beyond its immediate legal confines.
