Drama unfolds today as former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial, marked by a denial of an unconventional privilege by Judge Arthur Engoron, approaches its concluding arguments.
In a surprising move, the ex-president, a prominent Republican presidential nominee, sought to personally address the court, only to have Judge Engoron deny the request, leaving the final remarks to the legal teams.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, aggressively pursued a staggering $370 million in penalties, accusing Trump of inflating his wealth on financial statements provided to various entities.
More Read
Trump, vehemently asserting his innocence, denounced the trial as political persecution, as reported by The Associated Press on Thursday, January 11.
Undeterred by personal setbacks, including the recent death of his mother-in-law, Amalija Knavs, Trump is expected to attend court as a spectator, maintaining a routine he has followed since the trial commenced on October 2.
Despite labeling the case a “witch hunt and a disgrace,” Trump had a previous clash with Judge Engoron and state lawyers during his 3½-hour testimony in November.
Thursday’s closing arguments are anticipated to be a crucial juncture in Trump’s legal and political calendar, occurring simultaneously with another legal challenge in Washington, D.C. Appeals court arguments in D.C. question his immunity from charges related to plotting to overturn the 2020 election—a facet of the four criminal cases against him.
The New York trial, initiated by James in 2022, focuses on claims of persistent fraud in Trump’s business dealings. Judge Engoron’s pretrial ruling has already found Trump liable for years of fraud, including misrepresentations such as exaggerating the size of his Trump Tower penthouse and inflating the value of his Mar-a-Lago estate.
The trial encompasses six undecided claims, ranging from allegations of conspiracy, insurance fraud, to falsifying business records.
James seeks not only monetary damages but also the prohibition of Trump and his co-defendants, including Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., from conducting business in New York. State lawyers argue that Trump’s misrepresentation led to better loan terms, saving him a substantial amount.
In his defense, Trump asserted that his financial statements understated his net worth and placed blame on the external accountants who prepared the documents. He contended that disclaimers shield him from liability.
Despite the complex nature of valuations discussed extensively in the trial, Engoron emphasized, “But a lie is still a lie.”
As the trial concludes, the legal spotlight remains on Trump, with a decision expected by the end of the month, shaping the narrative of his legal battles and political aspirations.
