Former President Donald Trump has intensified his criticism of Judge Arthur Engoron, who presides over the high-profile New York civil fraud case that holds substantial implications for Trump’s business dealings within the state. The case, initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James, alleges deceptive practices by Trump and his company, including overvaluing assets and inflating net worth to secure loans.
Newsweek, in its report on Sunday, January 7, highlighted that Engoron, before the trial, ruled in favor of the primary claim brought by Attorney General James, setting the stage for a potentially contentious legal battle. Closing arguments for the remaining charges, covering conspiracy, insurance fraud, and falsifying business records, are scheduled for Thursday, with Engoron expected to make decisions regarding potential monetary damages.
In a series of posts on his Truth Social platform on Saturday, Trump vigorously criticized Judge Engoron. Accusing the judge of disrespecting the Court of Appeals, Trump claimed that the case was a politically motivated witch hunt orchestrated by Democrats to hinder his potential 2024 presidential bid. Trump’s sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, named as defendants, deny any wrongdoing.
The former president argued that Engoron’s valuation of a portion of his Mar-a-Lago estate was grossly underestimated and insisted that any discrepancies in financial statements were inconsequential. Trump contended that disclaimers on the statements protected him from liability.
Trump’s posts on Truth Social conveyed a sense of urgency, declaring the trial as “lawlessness” and warning of dire consequences for New York State if the case proceeds. He called for an end to what he termed a “pathetic excuse for a trial,” claiming that the rule of law in the state would suffer irreparable damage if the alleged partisan attack persisted.
Responding to the increased penalty request from Attorney General James, Trump labeled it as prosecutorial misconduct, characterizing the entire case as a Department of Justice witch hunt. He argued that businesses were fleeing New York, laying the blame squarely on what he perceived as an unjust legal pursuit.
As the trial nears its conclusion, tensions escalate both inside the courtroom and on social media platforms, with Trump using his considerable online presence to influence public opinion and shape the narrative surrounding the legal proceedings. The outcome of this trial may significantly impact Trump’s future business ventures in the state of New York and beyond.