Former prosecutor Joyce Vance is questioning the sudden change in Donald Trump’s stance on allowing cameras in his federal elections trial, suggesting it might be a strategic move rather than a sincere desire for transparency.
A recent report by Raw Story, Vance dissects the situation, highlighting Trump’s initial reluctance and subsequent filing in favor of broadcasting the trial. This reversal, according to Vance, seems to be a calculated bluff to manipulate public perception rather than a genuine commitment to openness.
Vance points out the contradictions in Trump’s statements, emphasizing that his sudden interest in courtroom cameras might be an attempt to avoid the public scrutiny that comes with televised trials. She suggests that Trump’s fear of the truth being exposed is behind his hesitance.
More Read
The legal expert draws parallels to the impact of public exposure on public opinion, citing the recent New York Times/Siena poll showing Trump trailing in key swing states if convicted. Vance argues that Trump’s legal team might be using the filing to build a narrative against cameras in court, inadvertently providing a potential justification for the judge to deny the request.
Highlighting the historical caution of federal courts regarding cameras and concerns about due process rights, Vance concludes by warning against falling for what she sees as a deliberate ploy by Trump to control the narrative surrounding his trial.
