The ongoing $250 million criminal fraud trial involving former President Donald Trump, a key defense witness, Professor Eli Bartov, faced questioning during an MSNBC interview. Former Southern District of New York prosecutor, Kristy Greenberg, expressed skepticism as Bartov disclosed he was paid $1,350 per hour, totaling nearly $900,000 for his testimony.
Greenberg, speaking with host Alex Witt, chuckled as she suggested that such a substantial payment could impact the credibility of Bartov’s testimony. She highlighted the stark contrast with the prosecution’s expert witness, who received about $350,000.
While Greenberg’s comments were presented during the trial, it’s crucial to recognize that compensating expert witnesses is a standard practice in legal proceedings. The ultimate determination of the testimony’s credibility rests with Judge Arthur Engoron, who oversees the bench trial.
Greenberg emphasized the unique nature of a bench trial, asserting that the judge is astute and understands the dynamics at play. The suggestion was clear: Bartov’s handsomely paid testimony might align closely with Trump’s interests. The debate over whether the hefty paycheck undermines Bartov’s credibility underscores the intricacies of the legal process, with the judge tasked with evaluating the testimony based on its substance and relevance to the case.
